PR

Reach reporters warned over unauthorised linking to commercial sites

New guidance for reporters at Reach publications have been warned over adding links to third-party commercial websites into articles without permission. 

What does this mean for PR? 

Despite the guidance, we have continued to see linking pieces of coverage for our client base across Reach sites. 

We anticipate that journalists will be reluctant to link to sites in industries such as Casinos, Crypto or Gambling. However, it might depend on each individual journalist. 

What does this mean for measuring success? 

Link KPIs should never be a sole measure of success within PR strategies.

Whether coverage features a link or not, here are just a few benefits of an unlinked mention in these publications: 

• High reach! National and Regional publications have high readership figures and that means more visibility for your brand
• Reinforcing E-E-A-T signals. Despite whether the mention is linked or not, you’re sending Google signals that your brand can be trusted
• Topical authority signals
• Building trust among core audiences 

Google updates Search Quality Raters Guidelines

Yesterday, Google updated the Search Quality Raters Guidelines with a clear focus on eliminating spammy SEO tactics.

The updates aim to clarify and align with Google Search Web Spam Policies. It also includes expanding the guidance, adding illustrations, and tidying up typos and outdated examples.

What does this mean for SEO and Digital PR teams? We now have a clearer understanding of what Google Search Quality Raters are looking for – and it starts with quality content. Ensuring we’re following best practices when it comes to content will be key, especially if you want your Digital PR strategy to cut through the noise.

Dan Richardson, SEO Consultant at danrich.co told Embryo:

Expert opinion

Dan Richardson, SEO Consultant at danrich.co

"Google’s latest updates to the Search Quality Rater Guidelines signal a further push towards attempting to combat low-effort AI content. With an increased focus on E-E-A-T and closer scrutiny of YMYL topics, it seems that Google is attempting to reduce the visibility of content that has minimal fact-checking done, by favouring sites that have high levels of trustworthiness and demonstrable expertise. What's particularly interesting, is the table of examples of 'lowest quality content' that they've added to it (seen from page 45 onwards). Essentially if quality raters believe your content to be: Inaccurate, deceptive, manipulative, unsafe, scam, auto-generated, or plagiarised, then you should expect search performance to suffer sooner or later. That said this aligns with what we already recognise as low-quality content, whether these rater guideline changes will translate into meaningful action from Google to effectively tackle the problem remains to be seen."